Skip to content

Psychological Safety I & II

TalkTimber Stinson-Schroff
researcheracademic
Psychological Safety I & II
Open resource →

Timber Stinson-Schroff argues that AI's workplace effects should be studied through occupational health frameworks rather than existential-risk AI safety, proposing 'cognitive ergonomics' as a better term than 'psychological safety' since it emphasizes chronic, long-term pathologies (like carpal tunnel from typewriters) over acute incidents. Drawing on the safety-one/safety-two distinction from traditional safety literature, Stinson-Schroff advocates crowdsourcing a database of AI usage hazards and pathologies—such as the 'yes man problem' from fast LLM responses and speech pattern changes—toward an eventual diagnostic manual, while cautioning against liability blind spots given the slow, second-order mechanisms by which these harms emerge.

Topics

ai-usage-pathologieshazards-databasecognitive-ergonomicsgovernanceprotocolspsychological-safety-reframingresearchsafety-one-vs-safety-twosecond-order-liability-mechanismssymposium-2026technology

Related resources

Talk

Trust Experience Glitches: AI Agents, Delegated Autonomy, and Legitimacy

Helena Rong (Assistant Professor at NYU Shanghai, director of the Protopolis Lab) presents a taxonomy of 'trust experience glitches'—six failure modes (agency assertion, epistemic camouflage, delegation ambiguity, opacity at scale, cascading autonomy, revocation failure) drawn from a 167-incident dataset of agentic AI failures. She argues these ruptures expose a 'consequence reception problem' where autonomous agents lack a stable body to bear accountability, and proposes that governance must shift from ex-post legal remedies toward upstream protocol primitives (capability-based permissions, provenance tracking, action-class legibility, circuit breakers, revocability) as the 'traffic lights' of the agentic web.</summary>

Helena Rong

Talk

Hand Washing and Bitcoin Share a Skeleton

Shingai Thornton argues that protocols are formally systems, proving that seven independent systems-theory traditions (Klir, Bunge, Mobus, etc.) share one irreducible structure—a 'walking arrow' or quiver where one thing depends on another. She uses Lean 4 to machine-verify this convergence across three worked examples: handwashing (a contamination-threshold homeostat), TCP/HTTP composition, and Bitcoin's difficulty adjustment (a fixed-point-governed homeostat), proposing this as a candidate 'floor' for a grand unified protocol modeling theory.

Shingai Thornton

Talk

Open Social Protocols: A Commons-Based Protocol Layer

Jose Leal (with Scott Clearwater) presents Open Social Protocols, a framework built on Needs (recurring coordination conditions) around which communities publish, fork, and adopt Protocols rather than collapsing into single fixed agreements. He describes 'bridging protocols' that let multiple competing protocols for the same need coexist and interoperate, built atop the AT Protocol and a 'Common Ground' layer, citing examples like Morning Star Farms and Buurtzorg as organizations already operating this way without naming it 'protocol'.

Jose Leal, Scott Clearwater