Skip to content

How the Protocol Institute is Adopting AI

ArticleTimber Stinson-Schroff
researcherpractitioner
Read article →

The Protocol Institute is building itself around AI adoption, using bots like C3PO and Humboldt to handle research discovery and organizational tasks rather than traditional human-led infrastructure. The organization's approach treats AI tool proliferation as a generative process, allowing practical patterns to emerge through experimentation rather than top-down design.

Topics

obliquitiesorganizationsprotocolsresearchtechnology

Related resources

Talk

Guest Talk with Evan Miyazono | Putting Protocols into Practice

Evan Miyazono, head of research at Protocol Labs, walks through his mechanism-design approach to protocols—mapping rules to strategies to outcomes—using Filecoin's proof-of-replication and the late addition of Filecoin Plus (a trust layer to prevent 'useless bit' storage attacks) as a case study. He then surveys Protocol Labs' public-goods funding experiments (hypercerts, retroactive funding, the S-process for preference aggregation, Funding the Commons conferences) and closes with speculative thoughts on open agency architecture for AI alignment as a future protocol challenge.

Evan Miyazono

Talk

Hand Washing and Bitcoin Share a Skeleton

Shingai Thornton argues that protocols are formally systems, proving that seven independent systems-theory traditions (Klir, Bunge, Mobus, etc.) share one irreducible structure—a 'walking arrow' or quiver where one thing depends on another. She uses Lean 4 to machine-verify this convergence across three worked examples: handwashing (a contamination-threshold homeostat), TCP/HTTP composition, and Bitcoin's difficulty adjustment (a fixed-point-governed homeostat), proposing this as a candidate 'floor' for a grand unified protocol modeling theory.

Shingai Thornton

Talk

Open Social Protocols: A Commons-Based Protocol Layer

Jose Leal (with Scott Clearwater) presents Open Social Protocols, a framework built on Needs (recurring coordination conditions) around which communities publish, fork, and adopt Protocols rather than collapsing into single fixed agreements. He describes 'bridging protocols' that let multiple competing protocols for the same need coexist and interoperate, built atop the AT Protocol and a 'Common Ground' layer, citing examples like Morning Star Farms and Buurtzorg as organizations already operating this way without naming it 'protocol'.

Jose Leal, Scott Clearwater